AGI Strategies
← overview

Culture · institutional

Research community norms

The research community ultimately chooses what gets studied and published. Researcher identity shapes behaviour more than employment. Norms on publication, review, funding, and citation constrain frontier development upstream.

Mechanism

Conferences, review committees, and professional societies (NeurIPS, ACL lineage) decline to publish capability research above a threshold, require safety review for capability papers, or blacklist certain work. Asilomar analogue.

If it succeeds: what binds next

Research community norms constrain publication and research direction. The binding problem becomes enforcement, the community that set the norm has to retain standing to enforce it as industry outpaces academia.

A strategy that produces a worse next problem than the one it solved has not done durable work.

Historical analogue

Biotechnology · Asilomar (1975)

Every strategy inherits a plausible ceiling from its precedent. The analogue conditions the realistic reach.

Produced

Slowed some research, established review cultures and voluntary compliance.

Did not produce

Norms set when biology was university-centred; AI research is not.

Load-bearing commitments

Worldview positions this strategy quietly assumes. If the claim fails empirically or philosophically, the strategy loses its target or its premise.

Coordination

Researcher identity ("I am an ML researcher") shapes behaviour more than employment, and a community can set binding norms.

Fails if: When frontier research sits in commercial labs whose incentives override norms, the community becomes irrelevant to the binding decisions.

Coordinates

Primary leverCulture (Cultivate)
Acts oninstitutional
Coercionconsent
Actor in controlhumans
Time horizonpre transition
Legitimacy sourceextra institutional

Conflicts, grouped by mechanism

0

No strict conflicts catalogued. This strategy pulls a lever that nothing else pulls in the opposite direction.

Complements, grouped by mechanism

4

Same phase, different layer

same stage, distinct levers

Both are active in the same phase of the transition but act on different layers (model vs institution vs culture). They cover different failure modes inside the same window.

Academic firewallingScientific accumulationAI worker collective action

Adjacent bet

different levers, loosely coupled

Different levers, different directions of action. They reinforce only via the general principle that covering more bets dominates covering fewer.

Whistleblower primacy

Same-lever twins

2

Both use the same lever in the same direction. Usually redundant inside a portfolio: each dollar or effort unit only buys one lever pull, even if two strategies are named.

Consumer refusaltwinUbuntu relational AItwin

Axis position

What the strategy acts onInstitutional
Coercion levelConsent
Actor in controlHumans as principals
Time horizonPre-transition
Legitimacy sourceExtra-institutional

Source note: Research community norms strategy.md